By Nikki Finke
EXCLUSIVE: You know I'm insecure about my geek bonafides which I've been trying to improve in recent years. (Heck, I grew up never reading a single comic book.) But I'm aware that the Internet has been afloat with Spider-Man 4 casting rumors in recent days. While Sony Pictures insists no decisions have been made, sources tell me that the producers have approached Anne Hathaway to star in the film. Maybe you experts have an idea what she'll play? All I know is that she's wanted for a starring role, and she won't replace Kirsten Dunst who's also cast in the Spidey fourquel. UPDATE: You readers think the role is The Black Cat.
SOURCE
================================================
Hmmm...I like Anne Hathaway. She's gorgeous and funny as well! She was sooo sexy in Get Smart. I think she's an excellent choice!...for any type of HOT female villain!
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Friday, November 20, 2009
Do Peter and Mary Jane Have a Lil’ Wall-Crawler in SPIDER-MAN 4?
by Matt Goldberg
In an action movie sequel, kids are deadweight. Unless we’re talking Short Round or some non-blood related child, all they do is showcase the taming of the wild, charming hero and a comic relief that isn’t comic or a relief. Even on television, when two characters have a baby, they try to shoo that kid off-screen as fast possible because he or she changed everything, as babies tend to do.
So when I read that Spider-Man 4 is casting “Toddler Boy”, my spidey-sense starts going a little crazy. Hit the jump for more details and speculation.
Spoiler TV got their hands on the following casting call:
Wow, it’s a good thing they’re not looking for an ugly toddler, with a sullen personality, no on-set experience, and who has a paternal twin so the film can’t keep continuity.
Now, I have three theories on this:
1) Peter and Mary Jane have spawned a child and now Peter has to deal with the added responsibility of being a parent in addition to his crime-fighting duties. This sounds awful because if you take the other rumors we’ve heard as fact, you probably have Peter experiencing the lure of Black Cat, then the Lizard kidnaps the toddler and Peter discovers that protecting his family is his greatest responsibility. Yawn.
2) It’s a dream baby and Peter considers the responsibility that child would mean. Or, it could be someone else’s child but when Peter and Mary Jane see it, they begin to seriously consider parenthood.
3) It’s a new villain. This is the best-case scenario.
Spider-Man 4 is slated to open on May 5, 2011.
SOURCE
=========================================
This is very interesting! Parker and Mary Jane's having a child?...I think not...I think it’s a new villain!
In an action movie sequel, kids are deadweight. Unless we’re talking Short Round or some non-blood related child, all they do is showcase the taming of the wild, charming hero and a comic relief that isn’t comic or a relief. Even on television, when two characters have a baby, they try to shoo that kid off-screen as fast possible because he or she changed everything, as babies tend to do.
So when I read that Spider-Man 4 is casting “Toddler Boy”, my spidey-sense starts going a little crazy. Hit the jump for more details and speculation.
Spoiler TV got their hands on the following casting call:
**********************************************************************
Spider-Man 4 - Official Casting Call for Baby Boy with Red Hair
[TODDLER BOY]
2 or 3 year old boy to play 2 year old, Caucasian with RED HAIR, an adorable toddler with an engaging personality, on set experience preferred. IDENTICAL TWINS ONLY
**********************************************************************
Spider-Man 4 - Official Casting Call for Baby Boy with Red Hair
[TODDLER BOY]
2 or 3 year old boy to play 2 year old, Caucasian with RED HAIR, an adorable toddler with an engaging personality, on set experience preferred. IDENTICAL TWINS ONLY
**********************************************************************
Wow, it’s a good thing they’re not looking for an ugly toddler, with a sullen personality, no on-set experience, and who has a paternal twin so the film can’t keep continuity.
Now, I have three theories on this:
1) Peter and Mary Jane have spawned a child and now Peter has to deal with the added responsibility of being a parent in addition to his crime-fighting duties. This sounds awful because if you take the other rumors we’ve heard as fact, you probably have Peter experiencing the lure of Black Cat, then the Lizard kidnaps the toddler and Peter discovers that protecting his family is his greatest responsibility. Yawn.
2) It’s a dream baby and Peter considers the responsibility that child would mean. Or, it could be someone else’s child but when Peter and Mary Jane see it, they begin to seriously consider parenthood.
3) It’s a new villain. This is the best-case scenario.
Spider-Man 4 is slated to open on May 5, 2011.
SOURCE
=========================================
This is very interesting! Parker and Mary Jane's having a child?...I think not...I think it’s a new villain!
Image Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/99479626@N00/2522135992
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
'Spider-Man 4': Rachel McAdams shoots down casting rumor
by Josh Rottenberg
Late last week, reports spread across dozens of Internet sites claiming that actress Rachel McAdams has been cast to play a villain named the Black Cat in the fourth installment of the Spider-Man franchise. If your spider senses got all tingly at the idea — well, sorry, but according to McAdams, it’s simply untrue. “That’s a total rumor, I have to say,” the actress, who will next be seen in the Dec. 25 action-adventure tentpole Sherlock Holmes, tells EW. “I was hanging out in Toronto the other day and someone came up to me and said, ‘I just heard you’re doing Spider-Man 4.‘ And I said, ‘Really? No one told me!’ It’s not true.” A rep for Sony Pictures concurs: “It’s an Internet rumor, as so many things are these days.”
SOURCE
=================================================
Well, if Rachel McAdams is not playing a seductive villain in a black suit in spider-man 4 movie, the most important factors for me are the story, effects and [still] the fight scenes! The resultant must be amazing! =)
Late last week, reports spread across dozens of Internet sites claiming that actress Rachel McAdams has been cast to play a villain named the Black Cat in the fourth installment of the Spider-Man franchise. If your spider senses got all tingly at the idea — well, sorry, but according to McAdams, it’s simply untrue. “That’s a total rumor, I have to say,” the actress, who will next be seen in the Dec. 25 action-adventure tentpole Sherlock Holmes, tells EW. “I was hanging out in Toronto the other day and someone came up to me and said, ‘I just heard you’re doing Spider-Man 4.‘ And I said, ‘Really? No one told me!’ It’s not true.” A rep for Sony Pictures concurs: “It’s an Internet rumor, as so many things are these days.”
SOURCE
=================================================
Well, if Rachel McAdams is not playing a seductive villain in a black suit in spider-man 4 movie, the most important factors for me are the story, effects and [still] the fight scenes! The resultant must be amazing! =)
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
SPIDER-MAN 4 Villain Revealed
By Rob M. Worley Source: Mania
Image Source
Mania.com has heard from reliable sources that Sam Raimi and company have begun the process of casting the villains and supporting players of 'Spider-Man 4'.
We can exclusively reveal that actress Rachel McAdams has met with the producers of the film for a major role. McAdams (of 'Wedding Crashers' and 'Sherlock Holmes' fame) is said to be a top contender for the role of Felicia Hardy, known to comic fans as The Black Cat.
Our sources tell us that the Black Cat's story fits well with Raimi's Spider-Man formula, which always finds the villains troubling not only the costumed hero, but also becoming entangled in Peter Parker's personal life as well.
And it looks like it'll be a two-villain movie. Our source also says they are casting for a male villain, but had few details. However, this would seem to discount the idea that Lizard is the primary, since the role of Dr. Conners has been cast since movie #2.
To know more, go to Mania.com
Image Source
=================================================
It's always nice to see a hot, sexy woman villain!
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Dylan Baker Back For Spider-Man 4 as Curt Connors… and also The Lizard?
by Brendon Connelly of SlashFilm
The Trick’r Treat special screenings continue, as do the Q&As with director Michael Dougherty. At last night’s presentation at the Lincoln Center’s Walter Reade Theater, the director was joined by Dylan Baker. Amidst the slew of reportedly dull and dumb questions, two things of note became clear. One: somebody in the audience was thinking that Baker looks like William H. Macy; and two: Baker is coming back for another go around in the Spider-Man film franchise.
You may recall that he appeared in the most recent two Spider-Man films as Dr. Curt Connors, the man who - as per the comics at least - is fated to turn into Spidey’s scaly foe, The Lizard.
A source for UGO was there at the Q&A, and reported on Baker and Dougherty’s comments. There seemed to be some joking going on, helping to keep the truth about Baker’s role rather fuzzy. Though we don’t know what size of role Baker is up for this time, I think we can be sure that it’s true he’s had the call and he’s coming back to the Empire State University for more.
Good. I think its about time they paid this whole Lizard tease off. What’s more, I think Baker is a really great actor and I want to see more of him, more of his Connors, even more of his motion-captured or prosthetic-enhanced, transformed self.
Actually, that’s a good point… how would they approach The Lizard these days? I’m liking the idea of Baker having to go all Serkis and romp around a motion capture stage, but I’m also liking the idea of a good make-up job.
So, when it comes to the mysterious villainy that Raimi, Ross and co. have in store for us, it looks like the needle is swinging towards the reptile end of the spectrum. My money’s still on the side of multiple villains though. Not that I want that (though I don’t specifically not want it either), but because that’s just what I expect.
---------------------------------------------
We have an excellent technology right now, that's why I really hope that the Lizard would look sooo scary, [again] like rated-R scary! Is that possible? ...considering a big group of fans are kids?!...hmmm...well, I just wish that they would make another version of Spider-man 4 movie for us adults in DVD!!! =) ...or in whatever format...and I wish there are two to three villains in this Spider-man movie!!! By the way, Dylan Baker is a great actor!
SOURCE
Image Source
The Trick’r Treat special screenings continue, as do the Q&As with director Michael Dougherty. At last night’s presentation at the Lincoln Center’s Walter Reade Theater, the director was joined by Dylan Baker. Amidst the slew of reportedly dull and dumb questions, two things of note became clear. One: somebody in the audience was thinking that Baker looks like William H. Macy; and two: Baker is coming back for another go around in the Spider-Man film franchise.
You may recall that he appeared in the most recent two Spider-Man films as Dr. Curt Connors, the man who - as per the comics at least - is fated to turn into Spidey’s scaly foe, The Lizard.
A source for UGO was there at the Q&A, and reported on Baker and Dougherty’s comments. There seemed to be some joking going on, helping to keep the truth about Baker’s role rather fuzzy. Though we don’t know what size of role Baker is up for this time, I think we can be sure that it’s true he’s had the call and he’s coming back to the Empire State University for more.
Good. I think its about time they paid this whole Lizard tease off. What’s more, I think Baker is a really great actor and I want to see more of him, more of his Connors, even more of his motion-captured or prosthetic-enhanced, transformed self.
Actually, that’s a good point… how would they approach The Lizard these days? I’m liking the idea of Baker having to go all Serkis and romp around a motion capture stage, but I’m also liking the idea of a good make-up job.
So, when it comes to the mysterious villainy that Raimi, Ross and co. have in store for us, it looks like the needle is swinging towards the reptile end of the spectrum. My money’s still on the side of multiple villains though. Not that I want that (though I don’t specifically not want it either), but because that’s just what I expect.
---------------------------------------------
We have an excellent technology right now, that's why I really hope that the Lizard would look sooo scary, [again] like rated-R scary! Is that possible? ...considering a big group of fans are kids?!...hmmm...well, I just wish that they would make another version of Spider-man 4 movie for us adults in DVD!!! =) ...or in whatever format...and I wish there are two to three villains in this Spider-man movie!!! By the way, Dylan Baker is a great actor!
SOURCE
Image Source
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Spider-Man 4 Official Release Date
According to MTV, Sony and Marvel Studios announced an official release date for its fourth Spidey flick: May 6, 2011. Still up in the air was the date when production would actually begin.
MTV had an exclusive interview with franchise director Sam Raimi. He told MTV that if all goes according to plan, shooting will begin early next year.
"We're hoping that it's the first week in March," said Raimi.
Raimi told MTV that screenwriter Gary Ross is now working on a draft of the screenplay. "I just gave him some notes and he's doing a rewrite right now," said Raimi.
"The production is starting to come together," Raimitold MTV. "I've got a production designer who is starting to design the sets and the environments that the picture will take place in. We just brought aboard Scott Stokdyk as one of the two visual effects supervisors, and I worked with him on all three 'Spider-man' pictures."
Other than Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst being signed to reprise their respective roles, no other casting has taken place. But the director said that they are now starting to think about it already.
...hmmm....need an extra?!...how about an additional character to give the story a twist...ahem!...call me! =)
SOURCE: MTV Splash Page
MTV had an exclusive interview with franchise director Sam Raimi. He told MTV that if all goes according to plan, shooting will begin early next year.
"We're hoping that it's the first week in March," said Raimi.
Raimi told MTV that screenwriter Gary Ross is now working on a draft of the screenplay. "I just gave him some notes and he's doing a rewrite right now," said Raimi.
"The production is starting to come together," Raimitold MTV. "I've got a production designer who is starting to design the sets and the environments that the picture will take place in. We just brought aboard Scott Stokdyk as one of the two visual effects supervisors, and I worked with him on all three 'Spider-man' pictures."
Other than Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst being signed to reprise their respective roles, no other casting has taken place. But the director said that they are now starting to think about it already.
...hmmm....need an extra?!...how about an additional character to give the story a twist...ahem!...call me! =)
SOURCE: MTV Splash Page
Saturday, October 3, 2009
Videos: Talking about Spider-Man
I can't wait anymore for Spider-Man 4! I hope it would be rated R!!! B-)
No, what I mean is, I would like to see versions of Spider-Man movies (not only Spider-Man 4) in DVD's (or blu-ray discs?!?!) that are not-for-kids fighting scenes!!!
But of course, that's just me.
Anyway, here are some videos about Spider-Man:
SOURCE: ReelzChannel
SOURCE: itn
No, what I mean is, I would like to see versions of Spider-Man movies (not only Spider-Man 4) in DVD's (or blu-ray discs?!?!) that are not-for-kids fighting scenes!!!
But of course, that's just me.
Anyway, here are some videos about Spider-Man:
SOURCE: ReelzChannel
SOURCE: itn
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

